Google SEO & Search Engine Marketing Services

Factors of a Natural Link Profile – It’s More Important Than Ever

Technically SEO could never be classed as natural, you’re undertaking activities to game the engines, whether you’re a spammer or a link bait specialist we’re all trying to achieve the same things, higher rankings and more traffic.

That said whatever activity you choose to undertake, you absolutely have to make it look natural, I don’t know why so many people struggle with this concept but with the recent changes and updates it’s more important than ever to come across as ‘genuine’.

So we’ve established SEO isn’t natural but we have to make it look like it is, how do we do it?

Over the years I have had the opportunity to work on all types of sites, corporate giants to brand new start ups, no matter what type of site you work on the results always last longer when you make things natural.

Lets go a through a few things that make up the natural mix;

Anchor Text

Good old anchor text! Not sure if you’ve all noticed recently but Google has been tightening it’s filters, sites with a lack of brand, variation and image vs text have been getting hit. With this in mind it’s more important than ever to build your anchor text using all of these elements;

Keyword Variation

If you’re trying to rank for a particular term don’t focus all your anchor text on the exact term, you will get filtered out eventually. I find the best way to pick anchor text variations is by using Google Suggest and the Keyword Tool;

google suggest long tail variation

google keyword tool suggestions

Use multiple terms regularly to keep on the right side of Google, it will also help you rank for more long tail variations. In terms of getting the right mix its difficult to say, I personally like to use no more than 30% exact, unless there is a good reason to be more aggressive, a peak season etc…

Brand Anchor Text

I blogged about this last year and quite a few people rubbished it, however I am sure most have seen positive results from building brand into their profile.

Again not sure what the exact mix is but if your anchor text profile is less than 30% brand orientated then I’d say it’s something you need to look at.

It’s not a case of doing this alone and you get high rankings, however if you are stuck in position 5 – 10 and just can’t break into that top 3 pack, then maybe this is something you need to look at.

Location of Links

I am seeing more and more link profile issues relating to the location of  links. If your site is based in the UK, you only ever do business in the UK and all your links are from the US then do you really think that is going to go unnoticed forever?

Blekko is pretty good for understanding the location split of your links.

blekko suggestions

Site Wide vs In Content

Again another obvious one, site wide links have been associated with link buying for a long time and towards the end of last year they were hit pretty hard. My advice would be to only use them when relevant and try and keep it brand based. In content links are so much more natural, think about it, when do people link? A brand new site would obviously create lots of new links, a new piece of content, however an established site would rarely keep updating exteranl links on a page, if all you do is acquire links on static pages your strategy is seriously flawed, stick with getting fresh links on new pages.

The idea of a ‘freshness’ boost has been talked about for years but it works, I would take a fresh page on a decent domain over a PR9 link any day.

Authority Spread of Incoming Links

Again I have written about this in the past and as far as I can tell it still plays a major factor in establishing how natural the link profile of a website is;

blekkosuggestions

You can use open site explorer to get the data and here’s a guide to pulling it into excel.

If all your links come from domains with an authority less than 20, the chances are you’re doing low quality publishing on article directories only and other low quality blogs. If all your links are from domains above 50 you’re probably spending a fortune on high PR links on authority sites. Even if all your links are in the middle somewhere you’re probably buying from a link broker.

What you should be trying to achieve is a very even spread of domain authority with links from every source possible, this to me would more likely be a natural profile.

Types of Links

This depends on the type of site you run, however I find it best to cover all bases. However be smart about it, if you run a 3 page site selling training services, you’re hardly going to be linked to by lots of fresh articles on blogs, however lots of business directories might be conceivable. If you run a blog then of course you should acquire more fresh links and social mentions.

However no matter what site you’re running I would always recommend a good mix, directories, press hubs, blogs, social sites and forums. Mix it up as much as possible.

Justified Links

If you have a site that never updates then your link velocity is going to be low, maybe a few partners and industry relevant websites every month but anything more than that is just going to look too unnatural. If you’re constantly increasing the content and pages on your site then you’re naturally going to warrant a higher link velocity.

Do things on page to justify the amount of links coming back to your site.

Natural Link Patterns

I think one of the worst link strategies you can adopt is ‘quality and relevance only’, why?

Think about it, if all the links your site ever acquires are those on high authority static pages, relevant to your industry and have to have a certain amount of links to them, does this really look natural? Would a link profile growing like this ever look natural?

Let me share a good example for you;

I got a link a couple of weeks ago from a post on SEOmoz blog, great link, super relevant and even had a good anchor text :) Happy days? Well ye, however a link on SEOmoz was not all I got, in 48 hours the my post that the link was pointing at got 210 track backs, 210!!! These were from all kinds of sources, scraper sites, news hubs, blogs re writing and publishing.

I think Google has to take this kind of link activity into account, one quality link and hundreds of crap ones within 24 hours? Do I get penalised? Is this unnatural? No and no. So why aren’t SEO’s taking this into account when running link building campaigns? Yes get quality links but don’t just leave it there.

I’m sure there are many other linking factors to consider when trying to establish a natural link profile, however these, for me at least, seem to be the most prominent. Please feel free to discuss anymore in the comments.

Line Break

Author: Tim (254 Articles)

is the owner and editor of SEO wizz and has been involved in the search engine marketing industry for over 9 years. He has worked with multiple businesses across many verticals, creating and implementing search marketing strategies for companies in the UK, US and across Europe. Tim is also the Director of Search at Branded3, a Digital Marketing & SEO Agency based in the UK.

Share

{ 15 comments }

Christoph C. Cemper October 12, 2011 at 4:56 am

Hi Tim,

really great post!

I want to comment on this “not sure what the exact mix”
and confirm that you CAN NOT be sure, because it’s differnent in every industry, language, topic.

I spoke about this topic at the last A4U
and also recorded it here, so you may want to check that out.

http://www.cemper.com/seo-knowhow/brand-links-twitter-tweets-facebook-likes-power-your-seo

Cheers from freezin cold Vienna
Christoph C. Cemper

Patrick October 13, 2011 at 12:06 am

Hi Tim,

well, I really can’t understand how you don’t earn at least one comment for this great post. I’m not sure, whats up in the UK or US or elsewhere, but in germany most SEO evangelists are teaching this stuff for over a year now. And it is so true! But on the other hand, most SEO executives still think in der own old-fashioned 2008 style. Well, great for the evangelists, they don’t need new topics ;-)

So thank you for this post. No step by step HowTo, but it shows the way how all SEOs should think, when they build links. This is a good ressource for reading later again, when the “everyday life” obtained us from this post ;-)

Oren Greenberg October 13, 2011 at 9:45 am

I have to agree with you here Tim, I think you hit most of the core factors on the head. I think the only thing that leaves speculation is ratio of fresh content to link acquisition volume.
O

Gordon McLachlan October 18, 2011 at 4:39 am

Nice article – it’s interesting to see how Google keeps trying to place more emphasis of natural ranking and linking, something I completely understand. Makes me think that ultimately they want to put all SEO gurus and marketeers out of business :)

Tim October 19, 2011 at 3:56 am

While ever there is a way to rank and drive traffic, there will always be an industry for Online marketers whether that be on Google, Facebook or any other of the big players.

Tim October 19, 2011 at 3:58 am

Ye it’s a tough one to figure, as a rule of thumb I always think there should be something to justify new links, pushing out press releases whilst aggressively building links can be a good way to protect against filters.

Tim October 19, 2011 at 3:59 am

Thanks Patrick,

I have been away and unable to approve any of the comments, it has had a few :)

You have to be careful doing how to’s, can’t give everything away but I hope people get a good idea of how to do there link building from this.

Tim October 19, 2011 at 4:03 am

Thanks Christoph,

Are you speaking at the up and coming A4U?

Simon October 20, 2011 at 12:17 pm

Excellent post.

When you mention location of site, do you mean geo domain extension e/g .co.uk or the hosting location or both. I know 1 and 1 have their hosting in Germany for instance would this make a difference?

How big a factor is this do you think this really is? Just ran one of my sites through Blekko and it is 57% US links. Mainly I guess cos I use directories Yahoo/Business.com and article sites all based in the US.

Tim November 1, 2011 at 3:06 am

I think having the correct extension is the biggest factor, however I would use a relevant host as well just to make sure.

Link profile is a difficult one, however if you have a site based in Germany and all your links come from the UK and US then there is a good chance these will be devalued, or at least attract more attention from Google. You’re right though, a lot of sites where links can be acquired are in the US, so it is difficult to acquire links elsewhere. If I had a site based in Germany or any other country I would make sure I had some authority links from websites based in the same location, you can’t get your profile 100% from the same country but I would be looking for at least 10% of my profile to be.

Design your own t-shirt November 10, 2011 at 5:43 am

Having in place actual real and natural links is more important than it has ever been and this is something I have been pressing to people for some time now! It is most essential that business websites have a full and proper campaign in place and do not try and cut corners and instead buy their links. With the link building for our website we have tried to make it interesting and we have commented on seo blogs as this has enabled us to learn more about seo whilst doing so.

Jim December 14, 2011 at 11:09 am

Great post, Tim. I’m a believer in the natural link profile concept and I try to mix it up as much as I can when working on various client projects. But I’m often left dumbfounded when I see some top ranking sites with exact anchor text ratios of 80 – 90 % (yes, really) most of it from blog commenting ! Some of these are in very competitive niches so it’s tough to combat that in the hope that Google will catch up with them.

Tim December 14, 2011 at 1:22 pm

Hi Jim,

I know there are sites out there ranking for all the wrong reasons but Google will eventually catch up with these, I honestly think relying on quality will mean whatever rankings you do achieve are there to stay.

Anwar January 26, 2012 at 4:09 am

Jim, thanks for clarifying specifically on variations. I was a bit confused as I thought only links from authority sites are helpful – but need to be variations of links from different domains, sites etc. Indeed very helpful.

Anwar January 26, 2012 at 4:11 am

Sorry for the name error, I placed Jim instead of Tim. Kindly edit it. Nice day.

{ 2 trackbacks }

Previous post:

Next post: