<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Shows Search Results Not Searched For???!!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seowizz.net/2010/01/i-meant-search-engine-optimisation.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2010/01/i-meant-search-engine-optimisation.html</link>
	<description>Search Engine Optimisation Servcies UK, Google SEO Advice and Resources</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:52:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2010/01/i-meant-search-engine-optimisation.html/comment-page-1#comment-1866</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 14:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seowizz.net/?p=1114#comment-1866</guid>
		<description>@Kai,

I see, it will have been reported by another webmaster, I can&#039;t see how Google would detect that automatically. I have to say though I know of a few different cases of sites being banned for keyword stuffing and have never known a penalty over turned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Kai,</p>
<p>I see, it will have been reported by another webmaster, I can&#8217;t see how Google would detect that automatically. I have to say though I know of a few different cases of sites being banned for keyword stuffing and have never known a penalty over turned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kai</title>
		<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2010/01/i-meant-search-engine-optimisation.html/comment-page-1#comment-1865</link>
		<dc:creator>Kai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 19:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seowizz.net/?p=1114#comment-1865</guid>
		<description>Tim,

It wasn&#039;t the optimized title text. It was because I filled it with poor content. Such as, &quot;are you looking for (title of post)? You can find many of those in the search engine. Simply type in the word and you will find many information on it...&quot;

It was complete junk just to get traffic lol.

-Kai
Twitter @lomak1985</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim,</p>
<p>It wasn&#8217;t the optimized title text. It was because I filled it with poor content. Such as, &#8220;are you looking for (title of post)? You can find many of those in the search engine. Simply type in the word and you will find many information on it&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>It was complete junk just to get traffic lol.</p>
<p>-Kai<br />
Twitter @lomak1985</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2010/01/i-meant-search-engine-optimisation.html/comment-page-1#comment-1864</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 16:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seowizz.net/?p=1114#comment-1864</guid>
		<description>@Kai,

Unlucky, however I have heard of this happening before with over optimized title text.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Kai,</p>
<p>Unlucky, however I have heard of this happening before with over optimized title text.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kai</title>
		<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2010/01/i-meant-search-engine-optimisation.html/comment-page-1#comment-1861</link>
		<dc:creator>Kai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 08:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seowizz.net/?p=1114#comment-1861</guid>
		<description>Yes Tim,

I was posting nonsense crap by following the Google Trends. I look at the Trends, and make a blog post with the title 100% optimized for the specific keyword phrase in the Trends. I was getting a lot of traffic but it was junk since they were not looking to click Ads. 

Then, Google caught on. I guess somebody reported my site or there was a huge spike of traffic + high bounce rate.

I removed everything, and now it is just a very small niche site that can potentially make a lot of money once I&#039;m back on Google&#039;s index. I am getting traffic from Ask, Bing, Yahoo and it makes a decent amount for a &quot;parked&quot; site. 

-Kai Lo
Twitter @lomak1985</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes Tim,</p>
<p>I was posting nonsense crap by following the Google Trends. I look at the Trends, and make a blog post with the title 100% optimized for the specific keyword phrase in the Trends. I was getting a lot of traffic but it was junk since they were not looking to click Ads. </p>
<p>Then, Google caught on. I guess somebody reported my site or there was a huge spike of traffic + high bounce rate.</p>
<p>I removed everything, and now it is just a very small niche site that can potentially make a lot of money once I&#8217;m back on Google&#8217;s index. I am getting traffic from Ask, Bing, Yahoo and it makes a decent amount for a &#8220;parked&#8221; site. </p>
<p>-Kai Lo<br />
Twitter @lomak1985</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2010/01/i-meant-search-engine-optimisation.html/comment-page-1#comment-1831</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 22:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seowizz.net/?p=1114#comment-1831</guid>
		<description>kai,

Do you know why they deindexed your site. They normally won&#039;t even consider reomving the penalty until you have admitted what you&#039;ve done and proven you&#039;ve taken steps to amend it. I have worked with a few clients on this sort of thing and what Google really want to see is that you have &#039;seen the error of your ways&#039; and have put it right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kai,</p>
<p>Do you know why they deindexed your site. They normally won&#8217;t even consider reomving the penalty until you have admitted what you&#8217;ve done and proven you&#8217;ve taken steps to amend it. I have worked with a few clients on this sort of thing and what Google really want to see is that you have &#8216;seen the error of your ways&#8217; and have put it right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kai</title>
		<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2010/01/i-meant-search-engine-optimisation.html/comment-page-1#comment-1829</link>
		<dc:creator>Kai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 20:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seowizz.net/?p=1114#comment-1829</guid>
		<description>Google still has my blogaboutnothingatall site deindexed. It is taking them forever to reconsider the site back into the search engine! They are above the law :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google still has my blogaboutnothingatall site deindexed. It is taking them forever to reconsider the site back into the search engine! They are above the law <img src='http://www.seowizz.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2010/01/i-meant-search-engine-optimisation.html/comment-page-1#comment-1826</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 23:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seowizz.net/?p=1114#comment-1826</guid>
		<description>@ Kai,

It&#039;s seems like they have fixed it now, but it is worrying to think a years optimisation is down the drain just like that, shows how much power Google has!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Kai,</p>
<p>It&#8217;s seems like they have fixed it now, but it is worrying to think a years optimisation is down the drain just like that, shows how much power Google has!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kai</title>
		<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2010/01/i-meant-search-engine-optimisation.html/comment-page-1#comment-1824</link>
		<dc:creator>Kai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 21:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seowizz.net/?p=1114#comment-1824</guid>
		<description>I never thought about this Tim. I think Google is trying to Americanize you all!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never thought about this Tim. I think Google is trying to Americanize you all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2010/01/i-meant-search-engine-optimisation.html/comment-page-1#comment-1822</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 11:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seowizz.net/?p=1114#comment-1822</guid>
		<description>@WDC,

The results do seem to have been sorted but for three days the results were preferring the &#039;z&#039; version. Either I&#039;ve covered my bases now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@WDC,</p>
<p>The results do seem to have been sorted but for three days the results were preferring the &#8216;z&#8217; version. Either I&#8217;ve covered my bases now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Design Company</title>
		<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2010/01/i-meant-search-engine-optimisation.html/comment-page-1#comment-1820</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Design Company</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 05:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seowizz.net/?p=1114#comment-1820</guid>
		<description>This is not a big problem to use the &quot;z&quot; instead of &quot;s&quot;.You want to results so it gave you,results are the same no matter of s or z.Google is such a big search engine,its results are authentic as compare to others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not a big problem to use the &#8220;z&#8221; instead of &#8220;s&#8221;.You want to results so it gave you,results are the same no matter of s or z.Google is such a big search engine,its results are authentic as compare to others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
