<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Finally Gives More Weight To Editorial, Natural Link Profiles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seowizz.net/2009/12/google-more-weight-natural-link-profiles-editorial-links.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2009/12/google-more-weight-natural-link-profiles-editorial-links.html</link>
	<description>Search Engine Optimisation Servcies UK, Google SEO Advice and Resources</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:52:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2009/12/google-more-weight-natural-link-profiles-editorial-links.html/comment-page-1#comment-2160</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 10:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seowizz.net/?p=1017#comment-2160</guid>
		<description>Hi again,

Link value is everything however kit is becoming more and more difficult to track. It used to be at one point you could set up hundreds of social profiles and rank a site for just about any keyword, however this seems to be working less and less.

I always advise having a constant flow of editorial links but the ones that will push you up the rankings is links from those sites that are trusted authorities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi again,</p>
<p>Link value is everything however kit is becoming more and more difficult to track. It used to be at one point you could set up hundreds of social profiles and rank a site for just about any keyword, however this seems to be working less and less.</p>
<p>I always advise having a constant flow of editorial links but the ones that will push you up the rankings is links from those sites that are trusted authorities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The System</title>
		<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2009/12/google-more-weight-natural-link-profiles-editorial-links.html/comment-page-1#comment-2158</link>
		<dc:creator>The System</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 21:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seowizz.net/?p=1017#comment-2158</guid>
		<description>Hi Tim,
I&#039;ve only just found your blog and though I could play devil&#039;s advocate on many things you say, this article is a masterpiece!
The value assigned to the link is the most important thing about it nowadays. We&#039;ve found that links embedded within social media and blogs are the most valuable for juice and you can compete with the big boys for &#039;any&#039; keyword!
Whether I&#039;d go so far as to say &#039;guarantee a top three ranking&#039; - yeah on  occasions probably!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tim,<br />
I&#8217;ve only just found your blog and though I could play devil&#8217;s advocate on many things you say, this article is a masterpiece!<br />
The value assigned to the link is the most important thing about it nowadays. We&#8217;ve found that links embedded within social media and blogs are the most valuable for juice and you can compete with the big boys for &#8216;any&#8217; keyword!<br />
Whether I&#8217;d go so far as to say &#8216;guarantee a top three ranking&#8217; &#8211; yeah on  occasions probably!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2009/12/google-more-weight-natural-link-profiles-editorial-links.html/comment-page-1#comment-1784</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 09:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seowizz.net/?p=1017#comment-1784</guid>
		<description>Hi Paul,

The search engines play around all the time to the point you sometimes lose where you are, that is why it is important to stick with the basics regardless. I am pretty heavily involved in PPC too and know it can be frustrating when Google seem to change the quality score rules, however with PPC they seem to give you more insight into how fully optimise, where as with SEO they haven&#039;t committed fully.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Paul,</p>
<p>The search engines play around all the time to the point you sometimes lose where you are, that is why it is important to stick with the basics regardless. I am pretty heavily involved in PPC too and know it can be frustrating when Google seem to change the quality score rules, however with PPC they seem to give you more insight into how fully optimise, where as with SEO they haven&#8217;t committed fully.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul @ Pay Per Click</title>
		<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2009/12/google-more-weight-natural-link-profiles-editorial-links.html/comment-page-1#comment-1783</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul @ Pay Per Click</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 09:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seowizz.net/?p=1017#comment-1783</guid>
		<description>Tim,
Thanks for the update on the new development. The SEs keep on evolving. Initially on-page optimization was enough. Then it changed to off-page factors e.g. link building. Now link building is not enough. Reciprocal links were the first to be despised by the SEs, now it is &#039;spammy&#039; anchor text and as you say links from &#039;home&#039; pages. The goal posts keep on moving. The story is similar on the PPC side. :(
Cheers,
Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim,<br />
Thanks for the update on the new development. The SEs keep on evolving. Initially on-page optimization was enough. Then it changed to off-page factors e.g. link building. Now link building is not enough. Reciprocal links were the first to be despised by the SEs, now it is &#8216;spammy&#8217; anchor text and as you say links from &#8216;home&#8217; pages. The goal posts keep on moving. The story is similar on the PPC side. <img src='http://www.seowizz.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Cheers,<br />
Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2009/12/google-more-weight-natural-link-profiles-editorial-links.html/comment-page-1#comment-1744</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 18:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seowizz.net/?p=1017#comment-1744</guid>
		<description>Hi Jack,

Editorial links definitely give you more bang for your buck, however remember anchor text and editorial factors are not all you should focus on. Link from sites that have a good PR are also worth getting links from, either in footers or part of blogrolls, you don&#039;t want to over do it with these kind of links but they are important for getting Google to trust your domian and index more of your content.

Glad you have found some benefit from the services I recommended. Keep plugging away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jack,</p>
<p>Editorial links definitely give you more bang for your buck, however remember anchor text and editorial factors are not all you should focus on. Link from sites that have a good PR are also worth getting links from, either in footers or part of blogrolls, you don&#8217;t want to over do it with these kind of links but they are important for getting Google to trust your domian and index more of your content.</p>
<p>Glad you have found some benefit from the services I recommended. Keep plugging away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2009/12/google-more-weight-natural-link-profiles-editorial-links.html/comment-page-1#comment-1741</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 10:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seowizz.net/?p=1017#comment-1741</guid>
		<description>Hello Tim,

Nice post and wonderful illustration of rankings. I have gone through many articles on this particular topic and your post have proved it in a best way. We purchased an paid article posting service from one of sources you provided here :-http://www.seowizz.net/2009/12/one-way-link-building-indepth-review-of-the-best-services.html

The links included in those articles are enjoying good rankings which was on 3 and 4th page of Google. All I can say is &quot;Editorial Links&quot; works :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Tim,</p>
<p>Nice post and wonderful illustration of rankings. I have gone through many articles on this particular topic and your post have proved it in a best way. We purchased an paid article posting service from one of sources you provided here :-http://www.seowizz.net/2009/12/one-way-link-building-indepth-review-of-the-best-services.html</p>
<p>The links included in those articles are enjoying good rankings which was on 3 and 4th page of Google. All I can say is &#8220;Editorial Links&#8221; works <img src='http://www.seowizz.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2009/12/google-more-weight-natural-link-profiles-editorial-links.html/comment-page-1#comment-1735</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 11:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seowizz.net/?p=1017#comment-1735</guid>
		<description>Hi Pchef,

Ye the anchor variations are becoming more and more important as Google cracks down on over optimisation. Sounds like you have a good set of variations so I wouldn&#039;t change much. Editorial links, in my opinion are the way forward, however I do see the benefit of having footer or site wide links but in moderation and from sites with good authority.

Have a great holiday, be back in 2010 with a new design!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Pchef,</p>
<p>Ye the anchor variations are becoming more and more important as Google cracks down on over optimisation. Sounds like you have a good set of variations so I wouldn&#8217;t change much. Editorial links, in my opinion are the way forward, however I do see the benefit of having footer or site wide links but in moderation and from sites with good authority.</p>
<p>Have a great holiday, be back in 2010 with a new design!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PotatoChef</title>
		<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2009/12/google-more-weight-natural-link-profiles-editorial-links.html/comment-page-1#comment-1732</link>
		<dc:creator>PotatoChef</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 00:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seowizz.net/?p=1017#comment-1732</guid>
		<description>Happy Holidays Tim...

Somebody else just reminded me not to go over 25% with exact keyword anchor text.  I am using a variation of my main keyword with 5-10 varitations of the the keyword.  Not is it only good seo practice but it also helps to rank for the longtail.

I was already a big believer in editorial links rather than blogroll or other types of site wide links.

See you next year!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy Holidays Tim&#8230;</p>
<p>Somebody else just reminded me not to go over 25% with exact keyword anchor text.  I am using a variation of my main keyword with 5-10 varitations of the the keyword.  Not is it only good seo practice but it also helps to rank for the longtail.</p>
<p>I was already a big believer in editorial links rather than blogroll or other types of site wide links.</p>
<p>See you next year!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
