<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Reluctant Response to an SEO Rant</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seowizz.net/2009/10/a-reluctant-response-to-an-seo-rant.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2009/10/a-reluctant-response-to-an-seo-rant.html</link>
	<description>Search Engine Optimisation Servcies UK, Google SEO Advice and Resources</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:52:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2009/10/a-reluctant-response-to-an-seo-rant.html/comment-page-1#comment-1329</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seowizz.net/?p=892#comment-1329</guid>
		<description>@creativeonion,

Thanks, I was always in too minds whether to publish a response or not, partly because I value my time and partly because I didn&#039;t want to give him the benefit of the traffic and link :) . There are so many people with this opinion of SEO whoever never really delved into the industry. It made me laugh when he said &quot;I now rank nineth for SEO, just by writing an article people enjoy and telling a few friends on facebook&quot; no that didn&#039;t rank you the insane amount of links you got did, SEO right? 

Anyway glad to see Google has updated the SERPS and dropped the page, getting a site there is one thing, sustaining it is quite another.

Thanks for the comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@creativeonion,</p>
<p>Thanks, I was always in too minds whether to publish a response or not, partly because I value my time and partly because I didn&#8217;t want to give him the benefit of the traffic and link <img src='http://www.seowizz.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  . There are so many people with this opinion of SEO whoever never really delved into the industry. It made me laugh when he said &#8220;I now rank nineth for SEO, just by writing an article people enjoy and telling a few friends on facebook&#8221; no that didn&#8217;t rank you the insane amount of links you got did, SEO right? </p>
<p>Anyway glad to see Google has updated the SERPS and dropped the page, getting a site there is one thing, sustaining it is quite another.</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: creativeonion</title>
		<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2009/10/a-reluctant-response-to-an-seo-rant.html/comment-page-1#comment-1328</link>
		<dc:creator>creativeonion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seowizz.net/?p=892#comment-1328</guid>
		<description>I really appreciate your response to Derek&#039;s ignorant rant. You&#039;re right that it didn&#039;t really deserve a response, but there are a lot of hard working professionals (like yourself) who could be hurt by such gross information.

I found it funny/ironic that Derek didn&#039;t even use the proper term for what he was describing - &quot;blackhat&quot; practices. Most likely because he doesn&#039;t know what blackhat or whitehat tactics are, let alone the difference between them. 

Again, thank you Tim!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really appreciate your response to Derek&#8217;s ignorant rant. You&#8217;re right that it didn&#8217;t really deserve a response, but there are a lot of hard working professionals (like yourself) who could be hurt by such gross information.</p>
<p>I found it funny/ironic that Derek didn&#8217;t even use the proper term for what he was describing &#8211; &#8220;blackhat&#8221; practices. Most likely because he doesn&#8217;t know what blackhat or whitehat tactics are, let alone the difference between them. </p>
<p>Again, thank you Tim!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2009/10/a-reluctant-response-to-an-seo-rant.html/comment-page-1#comment-1327</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 15:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seowizz.net/?p=892#comment-1327</guid>
		<description>Thanks timthief,

The truuth is these rants are pretty regular, this one particularly ignorant. I don&#039;t know anyone who has practised SEO and found it to be a scam or swindle, in fact I know web developers that have come to discover and appreciate SEO as a valid marketing strategy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks timthief,</p>
<p>The truuth is these rants are pretty regular, this one particularly ignorant. I don&#8217;t know anyone who has practised SEO and found it to be a scam or swindle, in fact I know web developers that have come to discover and appreciate SEO as a valid marketing strategy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timethief</title>
		<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2009/10/a-reluctant-response-to-an-seo-rant.html/comment-page-1#comment-1326</link>
		<dc:creator>timethief</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 04:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seowizz.net/?p=892#comment-1326</guid>
		<description>Well said Tim. I have used your free tutorials to educate myself and I find the rant you have responded to to be entirely off-base.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said Tim. I have used your free tutorials to educate myself and I find the rant you have responded to to be entirely off-base.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
