<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Footer Links Suck!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seowizz.net/2009/08/footer-links-suck.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2009/08/footer-links-suck.html</link>
	<description>Google SEO &#38; Search Engine Marketing Services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 08:41:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2009/08/footer-links-suck.html/comment-page-1#comment-4769</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 08:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seowizz.net/?p=724#comment-4769</guid>
		<description>Anything the user is more likely to click on is probably a safe option, using text around your site wide also seems to have a positive effect as well from the tests we have run.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anything the user is more likely to click on is probably a safe option, using text around your site wide also seems to have a positive effect as well from the tests we have run.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nottingham seo</title>
		<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2009/08/footer-links-suck.html/comment-page-1#comment-4766</link>
		<dc:creator>nottingham seo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 09:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seowizz.net/?p=724#comment-4766</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve run a few tests and for me links higher up in the CODE do make more of a difference. This is apposed to footer and sitewide links.
Maybe for SEO we should start putting sitewide links at the top of the page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve run a few tests and for me links higher up in the CODE do make more of a difference. This is apposed to footer and sitewide links.<br />
Maybe for SEO we should start putting sitewide links at the top of the page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Working at Home Blog Carnival-153rd Edition</title>
		<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2009/08/footer-links-suck.html/comment-page-1#comment-4697</link>
		<dc:creator>Working at Home Blog Carnival-153rd Edition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 18:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seowizz.net/?p=724#comment-4697</guid>
		<description>[...] presents Footer Links Suck! posted at Search Engine [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] presents Footer Links Suck! posted at Search Engine [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seo nottingham</title>
		<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2009/08/footer-links-suck.html/comment-page-1#comment-3095</link>
		<dc:creator>seo nottingham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2010 18:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seowizz.net/?p=724#comment-3095</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s always good to hear things from the horses mouth (as they say) 

Thanks for the post, very informative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s always good to hear things from the horses mouth (as they say) </p>
<p>Thanks for the post, very informative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2009/08/footer-links-suck.html/comment-page-1#comment-1088</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 18:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seowizz.net/?p=724#comment-1088</guid>
		<description>@seolondoon,

Thanks for the comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@seolondoon,</p>
<p>Thanks for the comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seo London</title>
		<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2009/08/footer-links-suck.html/comment-page-1#comment-1086</link>
		<dc:creator>Seo London</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 11:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seowizz.net/?p=724#comment-1086</guid>
		<description>Good post, i am agree with you as top links have always more value and visibility as comparison to footer links.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post, i am agree with you as top links have always more value and visibility as comparison to footer links.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2009/08/footer-links-suck.html/comment-page-1#comment-1046</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 13:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seowizz.net/?p=724#comment-1046</guid>
		<description>@searchbrat,

There has always been rumours of a first link priority rule, however I don&#039;t know how valid it is. Matt is never going to give anything away so specific and I am not aware of any research being carried out. I think it makes sense that the higher a link is up a page the more weight it should carry, users are more likely to follow it therefore Google should give it a little extra attention. A link in the footer buried in text is hardly the sort of link Google want to be giving any real weight to. I have attempteed to run a few tests now on link position but as yet the results have not shown anything significant, it might have to be one of those research projects that goes on for months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@searchbrat,</p>
<p>There has always been rumours of a first link priority rule, however I don&#8217;t know how valid it is. Matt is never going to give anything away so specific and I am not aware of any research being carried out. I think it makes sense that the higher a link is up a page the more weight it should carry, users are more likely to follow it therefore Google should give it a little extra attention. A link in the footer buried in text is hardly the sort of link Google want to be giving any real weight to. I have attempteed to run a few tests now on link position but as yet the results have not shown anything significant, it might have to be one of those research projects that goes on for months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: searchbrat</title>
		<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2009/08/footer-links-suck.html/comment-page-1#comment-1045</link>
		<dc:creator>searchbrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seowizz.net/?p=724#comment-1045</guid>
		<description>I am interested if there is a such thing as first link priority. What Matt says would suggest they are already doing something of the sort. I have read lots from Stompernet, SEOMoz about this rule but over on webmasterworld not many people seem to think it exists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am interested if there is a such thing as first link priority. What Matt says would suggest they are already doing something of the sort. I have read lots from Stompernet, SEOMoz about this rule but over on webmasterworld not many people seem to think it exists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2009/08/footer-links-suck.html/comment-page-1#comment-1042</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 17:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seowizz.net/?p=724#comment-1042</guid>
		<description>@Pchef,

Not a problem thanks for dropping in :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Pchef,</p>
<p>Not a problem thanks for dropping in <img src='http://www.seowizz.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PotatoChef</title>
		<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2009/08/footer-links-suck.html/comment-page-1#comment-1039</link>
		<dc:creator>PotatoChef</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 00:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seowizz.net/?p=724#comment-1039</guid>
		<description>Useful information...thanks for the weekend post!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Useful information&#8230;thanks for the weekend post!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

