<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does Exact Anchor Text Really Matter?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seowizz.net/2009/08/does-exact-anchor-text-really-matter.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2009/08/does-exact-anchor-text-really-matter.html</link>
	<description>Google SEO &#38; Search Engine Marketing Services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 08:41:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2009/08/does-exact-anchor-text-really-matter.html/comment-page-1#comment-2464</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 09:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seowizz.net/?p=687#comment-2464</guid>
		<description>Generally without a little on page optimisation is is going to be hard to rank a site, however this site ranks for SEO techniques and we don&#039;t really target it in terms of on page, however we have a few strong links with that as the anchor text.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Generally without a little on page optimisation is is going to be hard to rank a site, however this site ranks for SEO techniques and we don&#8217;t really target it in terms of on page, however we have a few strong links with that as the anchor text.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2009/08/does-exact-anchor-text-really-matter.html/comment-page-1#comment-2462</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 06:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seowizz.net/?p=687#comment-2462</guid>
		<description>Hey, thanks for the article. I came across it when looking through google. I was interested in knowing how easy it would be to rank for a keyword with no actual on page seo but just text links. 

for example, say we have a page about blue cars but we sent 1000 links its way with the anchor text &quot;Green Cans&quot; do you think we can rank for it?

Will take a look around the rest of your site,

Thanks,

Darren.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, thanks for the article. I came across it when looking through google. I was interested in knowing how easy it would be to rank for a keyword with no actual on page seo but just text links. </p>
<p>for example, say we have a page about blue cars but we sent 1000 links its way with the anchor text &#8220;Green Cans&#8221; do you think we can rank for it?</p>
<p>Will take a look around the rest of your site,</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Darren.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2009/08/does-exact-anchor-text-really-matter.html/comment-page-1#comment-1517</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 22:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seowizz.net/?p=687#comment-1517</guid>
		<description>Hi Michael,

I am actually in the middle of publishing some data on anchor text optimisation, so watch this space I guess :)

Usually anchor text to an established site compromise thousands of variations, however it is the exact anchor text that seems to hold more weight, SEO&#039;s have spoken before about tight alignment leading to penalties however any site ranking for a given keyword always has around 40% of it&#039;s anchor texts exact or a variation of the exact keyword. &#039;click here&#039; links will pass link juice but will not provide any keyword relevance other than click here, and who searches click here?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Michael,</p>
<p>I am actually in the middle of publishing some data on anchor text optimisation, so watch this space I guess <img src='http://www.seowizz.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Usually anchor text to an established site compromise thousands of variations, however it is the exact anchor text that seems to hold more weight, SEO&#8217;s have spoken before about tight alignment leading to penalties however any site ranking for a given keyword always has around 40% of it&#8217;s anchor texts exact or a variation of the exact keyword. &#8216;click here&#8217; links will pass link juice but will not provide any keyword relevance other than click here, and who searches click here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2009/08/does-exact-anchor-text-really-matter.html/comment-page-1#comment-1516</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 20:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seowizz.net/?p=687#comment-1516</guid>
		<description>Dear Tim,
could you extend the article for one example with anchor variations of a site you investigated, please? It is not clear for me, if e.g. when the site&#039;s name is www.seo.xx if links with the anchor &quot;click here&quot; are useful as well, if the targeted term is &quot;seo&quot;. I heard there are anchor text filters depolyed by Google, that punish a too overoptimised anchor text distribution. I would be curious in what the rest of the 15-22% of anchor texts were. Maybe you want to give an example?
Thank you
Michael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Tim,<br />
could you extend the article for one example with anchor variations of a site you investigated, please? It is not clear for me, if e.g. when the site&#8217;s name is <a href="http://www.seo.xx" rel="nofollow">http://www.seo.xx</a> if links with the anchor &#8220;click here&#8221; are useful as well, if the targeted term is &#8220;seo&#8221;. I heard there are anchor text filters depolyed by Google, that punish a too overoptimised anchor text distribution. I would be curious in what the rest of the 15-22% of anchor texts were. Maybe you want to give an example?<br />
Thank you<br />
Michael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2009/08/does-exact-anchor-text-really-matter.html/comment-page-1#comment-998</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 09:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seowizz.net/?p=687#comment-998</guid>
		<description>Hi Pchef,

Ye you should be anchoring the link to the post as &#039;big rock&#039;, whatever keyword you are targeting on a particular page, you should attempt to create internal links around your site pointing at that page using the target anchor text.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Pchef,</p>
<p>Ye you should be anchoring the link to the post as &#8216;big rock&#8217;, whatever keyword you are targeting on a particular page, you should attempt to create internal links around your site pointing at that page using the target anchor text.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PotatoChef</title>
		<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2009/08/does-exact-anchor-text-really-matter.html/comment-page-1#comment-993</link>
		<dc:creator>PotatoChef</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seowizz.net/?p=687#comment-993</guid>
		<description>Interesting article Tim...

I have a question about internal anchor text.  If the name of the post is &quot;Big Rock&quot;, should you be anchoring &quot;Big Rock&quot; to the post url or to the homepage url?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article Tim&#8230;</p>
<p>I have a question about internal anchor text.  If the name of the post is &#8220;Big Rock&#8221;, should you be anchoring &#8220;Big Rock&#8221; to the post url or to the homepage url?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

