<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Local Rank &#8211; Think Relevancy &#8211; Think In Community Links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seowizz.net/2009/04/local-rank-think-relevancy-think-in-community-links.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2009/04/local-rank-think-relevancy-think-in-community-links.html</link>
	<description>SEO - Search Engine Optimisation - Google Search Marketing &#124; SEO wizz</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 08:58:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Blog Carnival: Blogging: Sixty Third Edition Blog Carnival- Blogging ThatsBlog.com</title>
		<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2009/04/local-rank-think-relevancy-think-in-community-links.html/comment-page-1#comment-1078</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog Carnival: Blogging: Sixty Third Edition Blog Carnival- Blogging ThatsBlog.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seowizz.net/2009/04/local-rank-think-relevancy-think-in-community-links.html#comment-1078</guid>
		<description>[...] Grice presents Local Rank – Think Relevancy – Think In Community Links posted at google [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Grice presents Local Rank – Think Relevancy – Think In Community Links posted at google [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Developing and Supporting Entrepreneurs &#8211; August 15, 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2009/04/local-rank-think-relevancy-think-in-community-links.html/comment-page-1#comment-996</link>
		<dc:creator>Developing and Supporting Entrepreneurs &#8211; August 15, 2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 06:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seowizz.net/2009/04/local-rank-think-relevancy-think-in-community-links.html#comment-996</guid>
		<description>[...] presents Local Rank &#8211; Think Relevancy &#8211; Think In Community Links posted at Search Engine [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] presents Local Rank &#8211; Think Relevancy &#8211; Think In Community Links posted at Search Engine [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2009/04/local-rank-think-relevancy-think-in-community-links.html/comment-page-1#comment-442</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 19:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seowizz.net/2009/04/local-rank-think-relevancy-think-in-community-links.html#comment-442</guid>
		<description>@steve, 

wow I have my blog quality controller, thanks for the shout though :)

I think you have define what quality is first of all, many associate quality with PageRank, for me PageRank is the least of my link building worries. The two things I focus on are domain trust and relevancy, the more relevant your links are the better results you will see, in my experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@steve, </p>
<p>wow I have my blog quality controller, thanks for the shout though <img src='http://www.seowizz.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I think you have define what quality is first of all, many associate quality with PageRank, for me PageRank is the least of my link building worries. The two things I focus on are domain trust and relevancy, the more relevant your links are the better results you will see, in my experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve booth</title>
		<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2009/04/local-rank-think-relevancy-think-in-community-links.html/comment-page-1#comment-439</link>
		<dc:creator>steve booth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 17:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seowizz.net/2009/04/local-rank-think-relevancy-think-in-community-links.html#comment-439</guid>
		<description>hi Tim,
In your diagrams above, you used the word webage instead of webpage. :)
Anyway, GREAT post! I agree that a quality (relevant) link will have more weight than a non-relevant link, but the question I have is how much? 20 quality links would probably outweight 100 low quality links, but would they outweigh 200 low quality links? From what I have seen, probably not... That said, I say go for relevant links and you won&#039;t regret it.  steve booth</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi Tim,<br />
In your diagrams above, you used the word webage instead of webpage. <img src='http://www.seowizz.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Anyway, GREAT post! I agree that a quality (relevant) link will have more weight than a non-relevant link, but the question I have is how much? 20 quality links would probably outweight 100 low quality links, but would they outweigh 200 low quality links? From what I have seen, probably not&#8230; That said, I say go for relevant links and you won&#8217;t regret it.  steve booth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Grice</title>
		<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2009/04/local-rank-think-relevancy-think-in-community-links.html/comment-page-1#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Grice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 17:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seowizz.net/2009/04/local-rank-think-relevancy-think-in-community-links.html#comment-71</guid>
		<description>Thanks for that Pchef, I&#039;m onto it :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that Pchef, I&#8217;m onto it <img src='http://www.seowizz.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PotatoChef</title>
		<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2009/04/local-rank-think-relevancy-think-in-community-links.html/comment-page-1#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>PotatoChef</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 17:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seowizz.net/2009/04/local-rank-think-relevancy-think-in-community-links.html#comment-72</guid>
		<description>The link to &quot;Google Keyword Proximety&quot; is not working.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The link to &#8220;Google Keyword Proximety&#8221; is not working.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Grice</title>
		<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2009/04/local-rank-think-relevancy-think-in-community-links.html/comment-page-1#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Grice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 17:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seowizz.net/2009/04/local-rank-think-relevancy-think-in-community-links.html#comment-73</guid>
		<description>Hi Kai,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I think it is hard to be punished for inbound links as that would mean anyone could easily sabotage your campaign. However if a link isn&#039;t relevant in my opinion it passes little if any ranking value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kai,</p>
<p>I think it is hard to be punished for inbound links as that would mean anyone could easily sabotage your campaign. However if a link isn&#8217;t relevant in my opinion it passes little if any ranking value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kai</title>
		<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2009/04/local-rank-think-relevancy-think-in-community-links.html/comment-page-1#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>Kai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seowizz.net/2009/04/local-rank-think-relevancy-think-in-community-links.html#comment-74</guid>
		<description>This is a great post Tim. I&#039;ve used a perfect example before that Google gets angry when your site is about horse training and a Viagra site links to you. Maybe horse trainers love to use Viagra. Anyways, it&#039;s always about quality over quantity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great post Tim. I&#8217;ve used a perfect example before that Google gets angry when your site is about horse training and a Viagra site links to you. Maybe horse trainers love to use Viagra. Anyways, it&#8217;s always about quality over quantity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
