<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Anchor Power &#8211; Warning! This Goes Against Fundamental SEO Principles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seowizz.net/2009/04/google-anchor-power-warning-this-goes-against-fundamental-seo-principles.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2009/04/google-anchor-power-warning-this-goes-against-fundamental-seo-principles.html</link>
	<description>SEO - Search Engine Optimisation - Google Search Marketing &#124; SEO wizz</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 08:58:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2009/04/google-anchor-power-warning-this-goes-against-fundamental-seo-principles.html/comment-page-1#comment-1802</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 23:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seowizz.net/2009/04/google-anchor-power-warning-this-goes-against-fundamental-seo-principles.html#comment-1802</guid>
		<description>Hi Delwin,

The post was imply about how they have used anchor text to rank in a competitive market, if they are spamming their way to higher rankings this is something Google should get on top of.

The contact form spam is inexcusable and would encourage everyone to report it, however I reported all the spam emails I receive to Google I wouldn&#039;t have time to do anything else, I literally get bombarded daily. 

Thanks for the in put I am sure people will find it helpful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Delwin,</p>
<p>The post was imply about how they have used anchor text to rank in a competitive market, if they are spamming their way to higher rankings this is something Google should get on top of.</p>
<p>The contact form spam is inexcusable and would encourage everyone to report it, however I reported all the spam emails I receive to Google I wouldn&#8217;t have time to do anything else, I literally get bombarded daily. </p>
<p>Thanks for the in put I am sure people will find it helpful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Delwin Holeman</title>
		<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2009/04/google-anchor-power-warning-this-goes-against-fundamental-seo-principles.html/comment-page-1#comment-1801</link>
		<dc:creator>Delwin Holeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seowizz.net/2009/04/google-anchor-power-warning-this-goes-against-fundamental-seo-principles.html#comment-1801</guid>
		<description>National Positions has been spamming my contact forms and those of my web design clients. Perhaps they are using humans to fill them out, but it is unsolicited, and therefor spam. No different than any other kind of automated form spam.

I actually replied to one of their spam contacts via their GMAIL account and got a response today from another non-GMAIL account. They are using various GMAIL accounts to carry out their spamming. The GMAIL accounts are typically different each time I get spammed but it&#039;s always an identical message.

I reported the last email address to Google and everyone else receiving their form spam should do the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>National Positions has been spamming my contact forms and those of my web design clients. Perhaps they are using humans to fill them out, but it is unsolicited, and therefor spam. No different than any other kind of automated form spam.</p>
<p>I actually replied to one of their spam contacts via their GMAIL account and got a response today from another non-GMAIL account. They are using various GMAIL accounts to carry out their spamming. The GMAIL accounts are typically different each time I get spammed but it&#8217;s always an identical message.</p>
<p>I reported the last email address to Google and everyone else receiving their form spam should do the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2009/04/google-anchor-power-warning-this-goes-against-fundamental-seo-principles.html/comment-page-1#comment-787</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seowizz.net/2009/04/google-anchor-power-warning-this-goes-against-fundamental-seo-principles.html#comment-787</guid>
		<description>@Sharma,

Hi I&#039;m not sure what you mean. The whole point of the article was that Google put&#039;s a huge amount of weight on anchor text. Are you referring to reciprocal links? If so I don&#039;t think Google ignores them, just puts less weight on them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Sharma,</p>
<p>Hi I&#8217;m not sure what you mean. The whole point of the article was that Google put&#8217;s a huge amount of weight on anchor text. Are you referring to reciprocal links? If so I don&#8217;t think Google ignores them, just puts less weight on them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S.K Sharma</title>
		<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2009/04/google-anchor-power-warning-this-goes-against-fundamental-seo-principles.html/comment-page-1#comment-783</link>
		<dc:creator>S.K Sharma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seowizz.net/2009/04/google-anchor-power-warning-this-goes-against-fundamental-seo-principles.html#comment-783</guid>
		<description>I am not agree that Google ignores Anchor text interlinks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not agree that Google ignores Anchor text interlinks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2009/04/google-anchor-power-warning-this-goes-against-fundamental-seo-principles.html/comment-page-1#comment-646</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 18:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seowizz.net/2009/04/google-anchor-power-warning-this-goes-against-fundamental-seo-principles.html#comment-646</guid>
		<description>@Swiftek,

I have never heard of them spamming up until your comment but fully take your word on it. I was simply referring to the directories they have used to build links, if they used bots to apply the directory listings to low quality directories then you would hope somewhere along the way Google will pick up on it and penalise them. I really can&#039;t comment on what you have said because I don&#039;t know if it is true, all I will say is that if your comments are correct Google need to be doing a better job at keeping sites that practice that way out of the index.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Swiftek,</p>
<p>I have never heard of them spamming up until your comment but fully take your word on it. I was simply referring to the directories they have used to build links, if they used bots to apply the directory listings to low quality directories then you would hope somewhere along the way Google will pick up on it and penalise them. I really can&#8217;t comment on what you have said because I don&#8217;t know if it is true, all I will say is that if your comments are correct Google need to be doing a better job at keeping sites that practice that way out of the index.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swiftek</title>
		<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2009/04/google-anchor-power-warning-this-goes-against-fundamental-seo-principles.html/comment-page-1#comment-645</link>
		<dc:creator>Swiftek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 18:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seowizz.net/2009/04/google-anchor-power-warning-this-goes-against-fundamental-seo-principles.html#comment-645</guid>
		<description>National Positions DOES send spam!  They spam web forms and via email.  So far, they have skirted the law and most directories rules by using bots and/or humans to fill out web forms with spam messages promoting their business.

They refuse to acknowledge what they are doing and claim to be &quot;white hats.&quot;

National Positions are the worst kind of scum on the internet.  Don&#039;t do business with them no matter how good they seem.  You may very well end up at the bottom of the heap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>National Positions DOES send spam!  They spam web forms and via email.  So far, they have skirted the law and most directories rules by using bots and/or humans to fill out web forms with spam messages promoting their business.</p>
<p>They refuse to acknowledge what they are doing and claim to be &#8220;white hats.&#8221;</p>
<p>National Positions are the worst kind of scum on the internet.  Don&#8217;t do business with them no matter how good they seem.  You may very well end up at the bottom of the heap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Grice</title>
		<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2009/04/google-anchor-power-warning-this-goes-against-fundamental-seo-principles.html/comment-page-1#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Grice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seowizz.net/2009/04/google-anchor-power-warning-this-goes-against-fundamental-seo-principles.html#comment-75</guid>
		<description>Hi Kai,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ye people never get the anchor text potential. The problem is they see it as manipulation even though it is an obvious ranking factor. Matt Cutts always says &quot;If search engines didn&#039;t exist would you do it?&quot; If you look at this way I guess it is. The fact remains, search engines do exist and there are certain elements that help get high rankings. I do not see a problem in using them to market a quality site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kai,</p>
<p>Ye people never get the anchor text potential. The problem is they see it as manipulation even though it is an obvious ranking factor. Matt Cutts always says &#8220;If search engines didn&#8217;t exist would you do it?&#8221; If you look at this way I guess it is. The fact remains, search engines do exist and there are certain elements that help get high rankings. I do not see a problem in using them to market a quality site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kai Lo</title>
		<link>http://www.seowizz.net/2009/04/google-anchor-power-warning-this-goes-against-fundamental-seo-principles.html/comment-page-1#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>Kai Lo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seowizz.net/2009/04/google-anchor-power-warning-this-goes-against-fundamental-seo-principles.html#comment-76</guid>
		<description>I always preach to people that anchor text links are big factors of SEO, but yet I still the people I talk to misuse anchors such as just putting a URL of their site. You made a good point about using variations of anchor texts instead of the same one over and over as Google can get suspicious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always preach to people that anchor text links are big factors of SEO, but yet I still the people I talk to misuse anchors such as just putting a URL of their site. You made a good point about using variations of anchor texts instead of the same one over and over as Google can get suspicious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
